The First Ground Zero
By Royce Carlson
The site of the World Trade Center in New York has become
known as Ground Zero ever since the two towers were destroyed on September 11,
2001. But there was another, far more devastating, ground zero.
With two bombs in 1945, the United States military killed 90 times as many
people as died in the World Trade Center attack last September. Ninety times!
This is especially important to remember as the Bush Administration creates
contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against seven countries
(China, Russia, Iraq, North Korea, Iran, Libya and Syria). What are they
Until last year the term "ground zero" applied only to nuclear
bomb detonations. As we remember the terrible events of 9/11 let us also
remember the first ground zero – Hiroshima, Japan, and the arms race it
On August 6, 1945, at
8:15 in the morning an atomic bomb called Little Boy was dropped over the city
of Hiroshima by a B29 bomber called the Enola Gay. The 15-kiloton nuclear
device was detonated about 2000 feet above the city immediately generating
temperatures in the millions of degrees and sending a fireball out in all
directions. Even though the explosion was 2000 feet up, the temperatures on
the ground below it reached 7,000 degrees Fahrenheit, melting tile and glass
and instantly burning anything combustible. The blast generated winds up to
620 miles per hour and destroyed most houses and buildings within a mile and a
The men, women and children who were not instantly incinerated by the blast
were badly burned and exposed to very high levels of radiation. Most died
within a few months. It is estimated that 140,000 people died by the end of
that year. Subsequent deaths from radiation poisoning brought the death toll
to somewhere around 200,000. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on
Nagasaki killing an additional 70,000 people bringing the total from both
bombs to 270,000 people. Some were soldiers but most were civilians –
including students, teachers, mothers, fathers, children and the elderly. That
was the last time a nuclear weapon was used in a conflict.
After that, the Soviet
Union developed its own nuclear capabilities and an arms race began that
continued for 20 years. At the height of it in the 60’s I remember drills at
school where we would "duck and cover" and people were digging bomb
shelters in their backyards. It was a frightening time when one wrong move by
either side could have meant the end of life as we know it.
As more countries developed nuclear weapons and the number of weapons in
the global stockpile increased, the world governments realized the extreme
danger of this situation and began to negotiate treaties that would reduce the
chances of nuclear annihilation. Non-proliferation treaties were written to
stop additional countries from developing nuclear arms. START (Strategic Arms
Reduction Treaty) was created to get existing nuclear powers to reduce the
number of weapons they kept on hand, and nuclear test ban treaties were signed
to reduce the amount of radiation put into atmosphere. The world’s efforts
to reduce nuclear threat have now gone on for close to 30 years. The Bush
administration’s new plans appear to undermine all this work and may throw
the world back into a very dangerous arms race.
There are eight countries that currently have nuclear capabilities –
China, Great Britain, France, India, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, and the United
States. Two countries, North Korea and South Africa, know how to make them but
have abandoned their nuclear weapons programs. According to Natural Resources
Defense Council data, the world nuclear weapons stockpile is currently over
Three of the nations on Bush’s new nuclear attack contingency list
currently have nuclear weapons or the capacity to make them (China, Russia,
North Korea) and two more countries on the list are known to be trying to
develop nuclear weapons (Iraq and Iran).
How can the U.S. government assume that the people of other countries would
respond differently than the people of the United States would when faced with
a similar threat? If another country made threats against the U.S. would we
not accelerate our weapons development? Of course we would and we are. I would
not be surprised to see the other countries on the Pentagon list start nuclear
weapons programs to defend themselves against the U.S.
The amount of devastation
caused by even a limited nuclear exchange would make Hiroshima look like a
small affair. The U.S. currently stockpiles nearly 10,000 nuclear warheads,
some of them with yields greater than 1 megaton – 66 times as powerful as
the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Over 10 million people could be killed with
just one well-placed bomb of this size! The United States is the only country
to have used nuclear weapons in a war. The world must be terrified.
In our zeal to stop terrorism around the world, let us look back, before
9/11, to August 6, 1945 in Hiroshima, Japan and remember that we must be
careful to not become perpetrators of the kind of terror that we seek to
destroy. The threat of nuclear weapons use is just that sort of terror. Let’s
not go there.
What Can I Do to Help?
You can help stop this madness by letting President Bush and Congress know
that you do not approve of creating new nuclear weapons and the government’s
plans to use them. The Council for a Livable
World was created by a scientist who was involved in the first nuclear
tests. It functions as a watchdog organization to monitor nuclear weapons,
arms control and weapons of mass destruction. They have an easy-to-use
"e-mail activism" section that allows you to send pre-prepared
e-mails to your congressmen and the President. Do it now! -
The photos above are of various nuclear tests carried out by
the United States between 1952 and 1962.
You can reprint articles on the Zenzibar web site for free.
I am happy to help provide content for
your publication as long as I get credit.
To use an article in a print
publication you must credit the author and Zenzibar Alternative
Culture as the source, and include the web site address.
To republish a Zenzibar article on
your web site you must credit the author and Zenzibar Alternative
Culture as the source and include a clickable link to Zenzibar at http://zenzibar.com Please tell
me if you are going to
reprint an article by e-mailing me
and mentioning the name of the article and where and when it will be
To link to the article on
Zenzibar's site you can do a text link without any restrictions (you
don't even have to tell me, but it would be nice to know).
If you want to use the image
associated with the article you are welcome to use it as long as you
don't change it or use it in any way other than to link to the article
at Zenzibar. Also, please tell me if you are going to use the graphic. If you have any questions, please