|

| |
|
Expanding
Consciousness
By Royce Carlson
|
Humans have a hard-wired proclivity for division and organization that is
essential to survival but, in my opinion, is a potential obstacle to
enlightenment. In our minds we sort billions of sensory inputs and divide
them into categories based on the world views we hold. The dividing of
experience is unavoidable. We can’t help it. Neither can we stop ourselves
from organizing our experiences to create a conceptual structure I call the
world view. We use these world views as a filter for the cataloging of
future experiences. |
|
Click
here for a printable version of this article. |
|
Are there three
personality types? Are there twelve personality types? Are we
divided into mind, body, and spirit or is it really a division into
physical, etheric, astral, mental, and spiritual components of our
being? It seems that most of the spiritual and psychological
teachings divide and organize experience, too. Like I said, we can’t
help it.
It can be
claimed that this division and organization is necessary to
communicate concepts to others and there is definitely some validity
to that. The various divisions and ways of organizing things can be
helpful to understanding as long as we understand that these
divisions are constructs to help explain reality. They are not
reality itself, just as the word “apple” is not an apple.
Our senses take
in a tremendous amount of data. Most of it we toss out as
irrelevant. Whether a particular chunk of sensory input registers
upon our consciousness depends on the world view. Therefore our
world views serve as a filter for experience. If the experience
triggers something that corresponds to our world view, it shows up
in consciousness. If the experience has no relation to the world
view then it is likely to be ignored. Our world views cause us to
attribute importance to certain experiences and less importance to
others.
Our world views
consist of more than psychological, philosophical and spiritual
beliefs. They include our determination of what is valuable, what is
good, what is bad, what we want, and what we don’t want. They
include our habitual strategies and habits. They include the
language we use to talk to ourselves in our heads. These are all
conceptual structures through which we process our experiences. Much
of the time these structures operate below the level of
consciousness.
For example, if
we are on a road trip and get hungry, a desire for food triggers a
conceptual structure that may cause us to look for a restaurant.
“Food is in restaurants” is the structure at work here. Our
attention, then, will be focused on sensory input that corresponds
to what we understand a restaurant to look like, etc. What we may
not see at all are the orange trees along the side of the road, ripe
with fruit, or the wild spinach growing in the ditch next to the
highway. This is food, too - possibly better food than we could get
in a restaurant. But unless that portion of our world view is
expanded to include stuff growing alongside the road, we will likely
miss it.
The same thing
happens with philosophical and spiritual beliefs. Particular beliefs
tell us what is real, what is important, and what is bad or good. If
we hold them dear, experiences that do not fit the belief can be
missed entirely. People have experiences all the time that fall
outside their world view. Either the experience doesn’t register at
all or, if it does register, a person is more likely to doubt the
reality of the experience or doubt their own sanity rather than
change his or her world view.
Given the
limitations of perspective, our senses, the language we think in,
the beliefs we are taught, and the beliefs we decide on, it’s a
wonder that we perceive even a tiny fraction of reality. Yet this is
the condition we find ourselves.
| |